Files
ai-kefu-jc/docs/superpowers/plans/2026-09-08-stop-reasking-contact.md
T
2026-09-29 14:15:12 +08:00

955 lines
45 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# 修复"客户已留资后 AI 仍重复索要联系方式"实施计划
> **For agentic workers:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development (recommended) or superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task. Steps use checkbox (`- [ ]`) syntax for tracking.
**Goal:** 客户提供 WhatsApp 号码/邮箱后,AI 在任何后续轮次(含留资当轮)都不再索要联系方式——堵住捕获缺口、消除同轮竞态、给三条确定性索要通路加"已留资"门控。
**Architecture:** 三层修复:①数据层——当前消息即时正则扫描(不落库,仅供当轮提醒/路由)+ 正则形态扩充 + key 模糊归一,使"已留资"状态尽早尽全地可见;②提醒/过滤层——App 索要脚本与零号码墙替换句按已留资状态路由;③prompt 层——"假称已留过号"应对改为先查记录。持久化管道(轮末 extractor+scanner+recency)语义零改动。
**Tech Stack:** Python 3.12 / FastAPI / SQLAlchemy async / pytest(纯函数单测 + async_db 集成测),无新依赖、无 schema、无前端、无配置。
**问题分析档案:** 本次会话分析报告(根因 1-6 与因果链),实施时如需背景可读 `docs/2026-08-20-company-contact-handoff-changelog.md`(本计划是其 §6"已知限制"中两残余项的收敛)。
---
## 文件结构
| 文件 | 动作 | 职责 |
|---|---|---|
| `app/services/conversation.py` | 修改 | Task 1 同轮即时扫描 / Task 4 App 提醒门控 / Task 5 墙路由 / Task 6 触发词收窄 / Task 8 提醒逐字化 |
| `app/services/contact_pipeline.py` | 修改 | Task 2 正则形态扩充 / Task 3 key 模糊归一 |
| `app/services/boundary_filter.py` | 修改 | Task 5 新增 `NO_CONTACT_ALREADY` 常量 |
| `app/prompts/system.md` | 修改 | Task 7 "假称已留过号"先查记录 |
| `tests/test_contact_pipeline.py` | 修改 | Task 2/3 单测 |
| `tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py` | 修改 | Task 1/4/6/8 单测与集成测 |
| `tests/test_boundary_filter.py` | 修改 | Task 5 单测 |
| `docs/2026-09-08-stop-reasking-contact-changelog.md` | 新建 | Task 10 改动文档(仓库惯例) |
不动的文件:`app/services/ai_service.py`、`app/providers/glm.py`、`app/prompts/extractor.md`、`app/prompts/evaluator.md`、前端全部。
---
### Task 1: 当前消息即时扫描(同轮竞态消除,P0 核心)
**原理:** 现在提醒与 `has_contact` 用的是上一轮画像([conversation.py:149-151](app/services/conversation.py#L149-L151)、[conversation.py:165-166](app/services/conversation.py#L165-L166)),客户留资的**当轮**完全不受保护。本任务在构建提醒前对当前 `content` 跑一次纯正则扫描(毫秒级、零 LLM),结果只并入**本轮内存视图**,不落库——持久化仍由轮末管道负责,邮件触发时序零变化。
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/conversation.py:146-166`
- Test: `tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试(同轮提醒含"已提供")**
在 `tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py` 的 `test_reminder_says_no_reasking_when_contact_present` 附近追加:
```python
def test_same_turn_scan_feeds_reminder(async_db, monkeypatch):
# P0 同轮竞态: 客户当轮才发号码(画像仍空),提醒就必须已含"已提供+禁止再索要"
(manager, conv), _ = _setup(async_db, monkeypatch, ai=FakeAI(extract={}))
captured = {}
class CaptureAI(FakeAI):
async def stream_chat(self, messages, context=""):
captured["context"] = context
async for t in super().stream_chat(messages, context):
yield t
manager.ai = CaptureAI(extract={})
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "my whatsapp is +254712345678"))
assert "已提供" in captured["context"]
assert "禁止" in captured["context"]
asyncio.run(manager.db.close())
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_same_turn_scan_feeds_reminder -v`
Expected: FAIL(`captured["context"]` 不含"已提供"——画像为空走早退分支)
- [ ] **Step 3: 最小实现**
`app/services/conversation.py`——`stream_process_message` 中,将(约 149-166 行):
```python
profile = await self._get_profile(conv.id)
context_reminder = self._build_context_reminder(
profile.raw_info or {}, content, history, source=conv.source.value)
```
改为:
```python
profile = await self._get_profile(conv.id)
# P0 同轮竞态消除: 当前消息即时正则扫描——仅并入本轮内存视图
# (提醒/话术路由),不落库;持久化仍由轮末 extractor+scanner 负责,
# 邮件触发时序不变。
current_scan = scan_user_messages([{"role": "user", "content": content}])
effective_raw = dict(profile.raw_info or {})
if current_scan:
effective_raw["联系方式"] = merge_contacts(
current_scan, effective_raw.get("联系方式"))
context_reminder = self._build_context_reminder(
effective_raw, content, history, source=conv.source.value)
```
同函数 `has_contact`(约 165-166 行)改用同一视图:
```python
has_contact = bool(split_validate(
normalize_contacts(effective_raw.get("联系方式")))[0])
```
注意:`_enrich_short_message(content, profile.raw_info or {}, history)` 保持用原画像(该函数本来就排除联系方式,两者输出恒等;不动它以缩小爆炸半径)。
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_same_turn_scan_feeds_reminder -v`
Expected: PASS
- [ ] **Step 5: 写第二个失败测试(同轮 has_contact 路由价格墙替换句)**
```python
def test_same_turn_contact_routes_deflection(async_db, monkeypatch):
# 同轮"号码+问价": 价格墙替换句不得再索要(走 *_CONTACT 版)
from app.services.boundary_filter import DEFLECTIONS_EN_CONTACT
class PriceAI(FakeAI):
async def stream_chat(self, messages, context=""):
for token in ("it costs ", "$25,000 ok?"):
yield token
(manager, conv), _ = _setup(
async_db, monkeypatch,
ai=PriceAI(extract={}), source=ConversationSource.standalone)
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id,
"my whatsapp is +254712345678, how much?"))
msgs = asyncio.run(manager._load_history(conv.id))
assistant_tail = [m["content"] for m in msgs if m["role"] == "assistant"][-1]
assert assistant_tail in DEFLECTIONS_EN_CONTACT
asyncio.run(manager.db.close())
```
- [ ] **Step 6: 运行(Step 3 已使其通过;若仍 FAIL 则排查)**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_same_turn_contact_routes_deflection -v`
Expected: PASS(替换句为 "Our manager will send the exact quote to your WhatsApp shortly...")
- [ ] **Step 7: 全量回归 + 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/ -q`
Expected: 全绿(基线记录法见文末"残余风险"第 7 条)
```bash
git add app/services/conversation.py tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): 当前消息即时扫描喂提醒/has_contact——同轮留资即受保护"
```
---
### Task 2: 正则形态扩充(捕获缺口,P0)
**原理:** 根因 1 的四种漏网形态。所有新形态沿用既有"邻接绑定"原则(上下文词与数字必须在同一匹配内),且 `latest_stated_contacts` 复用同一批正则,自动获得覆盖权——这与"显式自述可覆盖"语义一致。
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/contact_pipeline.py:63-77`(正则区)
- Test: `tests/test_contact_pipeline.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试(新增四个捕获 + 三个误报防护)**
在 `tests/test_contact_pipeline.py` 末尾追加(注意:不要 import 尚未实现的符号,否则整个文件 collection 报错,Step 2 的部分 PASS 预期就没了):
```python
# ---- P0 捕获缺口扩充: 号码在前/无is/msg me/wa冒号 ----
# 全部经 scan_user_messages 断言,不直接 import 新正则符号
def test_scan_number_before_whatsapp():
# 倒装: "0712 345 678 is my whatsapp"
assert scan_user_messages(m("0712 345 678 is my whatsapp")) == {
"whatsapp": "0712 345 678"}
def test_scan_number_before_wechat_cn():
# 中文倒装(我的后无空格——正则必须用 \s* 而非 \s+,实证 \s+ 永不命中)
assert scan_user_messages(m("13800138000 我的微信")) == {
"wechat": "13800138000"}
assert scan_user_messages(m("13800138000 这是我的微信")) == {
"wechat": "13800138000"}
def test_scan_my_number_without_is():
# "my number 0712345678"(无 is/冒号)
assert scan_user_messages(m("my number 0712345678")) == {
"phone": "0712345678"}
def test_scan_text_me_forms():
assert scan_user_messages(m("text me at 07123456789")) == {
"phone": "07123456789"}
assert scan_user_messages(m("msg me 07123456789")) == {
"phone": "07123456789"}
def test_scan_wa_colon_local_number():
assert scan_user_messages(m("wa: 07123456789")) == {
"whatsapp": "07123456789"}
def test_scan_new_forms_do_not_grab_prices():
# 误报防护: 价格/单号即使与 whatsapp 词同现也不得捕获(无 my 指称/无邻接)
assert scan_user_messages(m("paid 2500000 via whatsapp transfer")) == {}
assert scan_user_messages(m("my budget 25000 number one priority")) == {}
assert scan_user_messages(m("order 1234567 is my order number")) == {}
# 排位表述(实证: 若倒装正则收 number/phone,"2500000 is my number" 被误捕,
# 且 latest_stated_contacts 覆盖权会把真实号码翻新成价格)——倒装只收显式渠道词
assert scan_user_messages(m("2500000 is my number one choice")) == {}
# wa 词界守卫: "my watch/way" 的 wa 后无词边界,不得命中
assert scan_user_messages(m("0712345678 my watch")) == {}
assert scan_user_messages(m("0712345678 my way home")) == {}
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_contact_pipeline.py -k "number_before or without_is or text_me or wa_colon or new_forms" -v`
Expected: 5 个捕获测试 FAIL(返回 `{}`),防误报测试中仅排位/词界两条 FAIL(现状不捕获所以应 PASS——注意:若误报测试也全 PASS 属正常,`-k` 选中的 FAIL 集合 = 5 捕获 + 可能 0~2 防误报,以最终实现后全绿为准)
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现——扩充正则与扫描接线**
`app/services/contact_pipeline.py`:
WHATSAPP_CTX_RE 的交替组**加**裸 `wa` 冒号形态(仅冒号,防 "in WA state" 误绑)——⚠️ 保留原有 `wa\.?me` 分支,是三元交替而非替换(评审实证:漏掉它会击穿既有 `test_scan_wa_me_link`):
```python
WHATSAPP_CTX_RE = re.compile(
r"(?:whats\s*app|wa\.?me|(?:^|\b)wa\s*[::])\D{0,12}(\+?\d[\d\s\-().]{5,17}\d)",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
```
PHONE_CTX_RE 交替组加两形态(无 is 的紧邻 / msg-text-ping me):
```python
PHONE_CTX_RE = re.compile(
r"(?:my\s+(?:(?:new|other|another)\s+)?(?:phone\s+)?number\s+is|"
r"my\s+(?:(?:new|other|another)\s+)?phone\s+is|"
r"my\s+(?:(?:new|other|another)\s+)?number\s+|"
r"(?:msg|message|text|ping)\s+me\s+(?:at|on)?\s*|"
r"call\s+me\s+(?:at|on)|reach\s+me\s+(?:at|on)|"
r"phone\s*[::]|number\s*[::]|号码\s*[::]|手机号?\s*[::]|电话\s*[::])\s*"
r"(\+?\d[\d\s\-().]{5,17}\d)",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
```
(注意 `my ... number\s+` 分支要求数字紧随其后——"my number one pick" 中 "one" 非数字,天然不匹配。)
新增倒装正则与其在 `scan_user_messages`/`latest_stated_contacts` 的接线:
```python
# 倒装自述: "0712 345 678 is my whatsapp / 13800138000 我的微信"
# ⚠️ 只收显式渠道词(whatsapp/wa/wechat/微信),不收 number/phone/号码——
# 自查实证: "2500000 is my number one choice" 这类排位表述会把价格误绑成
# 号码,且本正则进入 latest_stated_contacts 即获覆盖权,误捕获会翻新掉
# 已存真实号码(正是 S1 系测试在防的事故类)。倒装电话表述罕见,不值得
# 为其承担该风险;电话主通路由 PHONE_CTX_RE 前缀形态/standalone/INTL 覆盖。
# (?:my|我的)后用 \s* 而非 \s+: 中文"我的微信"连写无空白,\s+ 永不命中(实证)。
NUMBER_FIRST_RE = re.compile(
r"(\+?\d[\d\s\-().]{5,17}\d)\s*(?:is|这是)?\s*"
r"(?:my|我的)\s*(whats\s*app|wa\b|wechat|微信)",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
_NUMBER_FIRST_CHANNEL = {
"whatsapp": "whatsapp", "whats app": "whatsapp", "wa": "whatsapp",
"wechat": "wechat", "微信": "wechat",
}
```
`scan_user_messages` 内、whatsapp 分支之后追加:
```python
if "whatsapp" not in found and "phone" not in found:
hit = NUMBER_FIRST_RE.search(text)
if hit:
ch = _NUMBER_FIRST_CHANNEL[hit.group(2).strip().lower()]
found[ch] = hit.group(1)
```
`latest_stated_contacts` 的循环内追加(与 scan 同位):
```python
hit = NUMBER_FIRST_RE.search(text)
if hit:
ch = _NUMBER_FIRST_CHANNEL[hit.group(2).strip().lower()]
latest[ch] = hit.group(1)
```
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过(含全文件旧测试防回归)**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_contact_pipeline.py -v`
Expected: 全 PASS(旧测试无一变化——扩充只增交替分支)
- [ ] **Step 5: 提交**
```bash
git add app/services/contact_pipeline.py tests/test_contact_pipeline.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): 正则补四形态——倒装/无is/my number紧邻/msg-text-ping me/wa冒号"
```
---
### Task 3: normalize_contacts key 模糊归一(extractor 变体 key 不再静默丢值)
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/contact_pipeline.py:13-34`
- Test: `tests/test_contact_pipeline.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试**
```python
def test_normalize_fuzzy_key_variants():
# extractor 常见即兴 key(精确别名表外)不得静默丢值
assert normalize_contacts({"联系电话": "13800138000"}) == {"phone": "13800138000"}
assert normalize_contacts({"手机号": "13800138000"}) == {"phone": "13800138000"}
assert normalize_contacts({"WhatsApp账号": "+254712345678"}) == {
"whatsapp": "+254712345678"}
def test_normalize_unknown_key_still_dropped():
# 完全不含渠道词的 key 仍然丢弃(如 "备注")
assert normalize_contacts({"备注": "13800138000"}) == {}
def test_normalize_slash_combined_key_deterministic():
# "电话/WhatsApp" 双渠道复合 key: 按 KEY_ALIASES 声明序取第一个命中(phone 先于 whatsapp)
assert normalize_contacts({"电话/WhatsApp": "13800138000"}) == {
"phone": "13800138000"}
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_contact_pipeline.py -k fuzzy -v`
Expected: FAIL(现精确匹配返回 `{}`)
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现——精确优先,contains 兜底**
`KEY_ALIASES` 显式补入:`"联系电话": "phone", "手机号": "phone", "手机号码": "phone", "wa": "whatsapp", "wsp": "whatsapp", "whatsapp账号": "whatsapp"`(显式补齐常用形态,减少对 contains 的依赖面)。
`normalize_contacts` 改为:
```python
def normalize_contacts(raw: dict | None) -> dict:
"""key 归一化 + 去空值。精确别名优先;未命中再做 contains 兜底
(extractor 即兴变体 key 不静默丢值)。contains 按 KEY_ALIASES 声明序
取第一个命中——复合 key(电话/WhatsApp)结果确定。"""
out: dict[str, str] = {}
for k, v in (raw or {}).items():
key = str(k).strip().lower()
alias = KEY_ALIASES.get(key)
if alias is None:
for name, target in KEY_ALIASES.items():
if name in key:
alias = target
break
val = str(v or "").strip()
if alias and val:
out[alias] = val
return out
```
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过 + 全文件回归**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_contact_pipeline.py -v`
Expected: 全 PASS
- [ ] **Step 5: 提交**
```bash
git add app/services/contact_pipeline.py tests/test_contact_pipeline.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): key 归一化精确优先+contains兜底——extractor 变体 key 不再丢值"
```
---
### Task 4: App 索要提醒按已留资门控(拆确定性索要引擎①)
**原理:** [conversation.py:497-508](app/services/conversation.py#L497-L508) 的 App 分支逐字脚本 "Drop your WhatsApp..." 在 `CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE` 命中时无条件注入,哪怕 confirmed/suspect 已存在——同一条提醒里"禁止再索要"与"逐字 Drop your WhatsApp"互相打架,而 changelog §3.2 已实证 GLM 听逐字不听抽象。改为:已留资时注入"经理会主动联系你"版逐字脚本。web 分支不动。
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/conversation.py:496-508、524-553`
- Test: `tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试**
```python
def test_reminder_app_contact_ask_gated_by_existing_contact():
# App 会话已留资 + 再次索要我方联系方式 → 不得注入 "Drop your WhatsApp" 索要脚本
raw = {"联系方式": {"whatsapp": "+254712345678"}}
text = ConversationManager._build_context_reminder(
raw, "how can I contact you", [], source="app")
assert "Drop your WhatsApp" not in text
assert "reach out to you at your WhatsApp" in text # 已留资版逐字脚本
def test_reminder_app_contact_ask_without_contact_keeps_script():
# App 会话未留资 → 原反向留资脚本原样保留
text = ConversationManager._build_context_reminder(
{}, "how can I contact you", [], source="app")
assert "Drop your WhatsApp" in text
def test_reminder_web_branch_unchanged():
# web 分支不受影响
text = ConversationManager._build_context_reminder(
{}, "how can I contact you", [], source="widget")
assert "tap the WhatsApp button" in text.lower()
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py -k "app_contact_ask or web_branch_unchanged" -v`
Expected: 门控测试 FAIL(现无条件注入 Drop 脚本);后两个 PASS
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现——联系方式状态前移,App 分支三态**
`_build_context_reminder` 中,把 contact_note 构建移到联系方式判定之后。结构变为:
```python
# 联系方式状态前移(供 boundary/contact 提醒共用判定)
contacts_all = normalize_contacts(raw_info.get("联系方式"))
confirmed, suspect = split_validate(contacts_all)
contact_note = ""
if CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search(latest_msg or ""):
if source == "app":
if confirmed or suspect:
# 已留资: 索要我方联系方式 → 逐字"经理主动联系"版,
# 与"禁止再索要"提醒不再打架
contact_note = (
"⚠️ 客户正在索要我方联系方式,且客户已留过自己的联系方式。"
"请逐字使用这句:\"Our manager will reach out to you at your "
"WhatsApp shortly with the full quote!\"(中文同理)。"
"绝对禁止输出任何号码或邮箱,也绝对禁止再索要联系方式。")
else:
contact_note = ("⚠️ 客户正在索要我方联系方式(最高意向信号)。当前为 App 会话,"
"没有页面按钮——禁止使用任何 tap/button 按钮话术!请逐字使用这句:"
"\"Drop your WhatsApp and our manager will reach out to you directly "
"with the full quote!\"(中文同理引导客户留联系方式)。"
"绝对禁止输出任何号码或邮箱。")
else:
contact_note = ("⚠️ 客户正在索要我方联系方式(最高意向信号)。请逐字使用这句指路:"
"\"Just tap the WhatsApp button at the top of this chat — "
"our manager replies fast!\"(邮箱同理指 Email 按钮)。"
"绝对禁止口头报出任何号码或邮箱。")
```
下方原 `contacts_all = normalize_contacts(...)` / `confirmed, suspect = split_validate(...)` 两行(约 524-525 行)删除(已前移),其余 confirmed/suspect 渲染逻辑原样保留。早退分支 `if not raw_info:` 在 contact_note 之后、前移的联系方式判定之后——注意早退时 confirmed/suspect 已算好,直接可用(空画像必然双空,行为不变)。
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过 + 提醒全组回归**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py -k reminder -v`
Expected: 全 PASS(含旧 6 个 reminder 测试)
- [ ] **Step 5: 提交**
```bash
git add app/services/conversation.py tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): App 索要提醒按已留资门控——已留资注入'经理主动联系'逐字脚本"
```
---
### Task 5: 零号码墙替换句按 has_contact 路由(拆确定性索要引擎②)
**原理:** [conversation.py:216-217](app/services/conversation.py#L216-L217) 的 no_contact 分支不查 has_contact,`NO_CONTACT_APP` 文案本身就是索要——AI 回显号码形态稍有出入触发墙后,替换句在客户刚发完号之后立刻再要一次。与 F6 修价格墙的同款矛盾,用同款修法。
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/boundary_filter.py:119-122`
- Modify: `app/services/conversation.py:209-217`
- Test: `tests/test_boundary_filter.py`、`tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试**
`tests/test_boundary_filter.py`:
```python
def test_no_contact_already_template_clean():
from app.services.boundary_filter import NO_CONTACT_ALREADY
assert not no_contact_value(NO_CONTACT_ALREADY) # 模板自身无号码/邮箱
assert "WhatsApp?" not in NO_CONTACT_ALREADY # 不索要
```
`tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`:
```python
def test_no_contact_wall_already_contact_no_reask(async_db, monkeypatch):
# 已留资 + 墙触发(AI 回显形态出入) → 替换句不得再索要
from app.services.boundary_filter import NO_CONTACT_ALREADY
class EchoAI(FakeAI):
async def stream_chat(self, messages, context=""):
# 客户发的是 254712 345678,AI 回显错成 254712 345999(改中间数字,
# 不是子串——回显豁免是子串判定,"54712345678" 这种去首位形态仍是
# "254712345678" 的子串,豁免会放行,墙根本不触发,测试变空转)
for token in ("got it, ", "254712 345999 call you soon"):
yield token
(manager, conv), _ = _setup(
async_db, monkeypatch,
ai=EchoAI(extract={}), source=ConversationSource.standalone)
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "my whatsapp is 254712 345678"))
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "so how much is tang?"))
msgs = asyncio.run(manager._load_history(conv.id))
tail = [m["content"] for m in msgs if m["role"] == "assistant"][-1]
# 精确断言(评审加固): 负向断言("WhatsApp?" not in)对三种替换句都空转通过,
# 必须钉死路由结果本身
assert tail == NO_CONTACT_ALREADY
asyncio.run(manager.db.close())
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_boundary_filter.py::test_no_contact_already_template_clean tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_no_contact_wall_already_contact_no_reask -v`
Expected: FAIL(`NO_CONTACT_ALREADY` 不存在 / 替换句为 `NO_CONTACT_WEB`)
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现**
`app/services/boundary_filter.py` 常量区加:
```python
# F6 同款(15.3 补): 已留资时零号码墙替换句不得索要
NO_CONTACT_ALREADY = ("Got it — our manager will reach out to you at your "
"WhatsApp shortly with the full quote!")
```
`app/services/conversation.py` no_contact 分支改为:
```python
if violation == "no_contact":
# 零号码墙替换句: 已留资→确认话术(不再索要);未留资按 source 分支
closing = (NO_CONTACT_ALREADY if has_contact
else (NO_CONTACT_APP if conv.source.value == "app"
else NO_CONTACT_WEB))
```
(import 行补 `NO_CONTACT_ALREADY`。)
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过 + 全量回归**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/ -q`
Expected: 全绿
- [ ] **Step 5: 提交**
```bash
git add app/services/boundary_filter.py app/services/conversation.py \
tests/test_boundary_filter.py tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): 零号码墙替换句按 has_contact 路由——已留资不再索要(F6 同款)"
```
---
### Task 5b: 再索要墙(已留资时输出侧确定性拦截索要句)
**原理(生产日志实证补强):** 2026-09 真机日志显示,4 次违规索要**全部**是 GLM 自由生成(逐字复述 system.md 留资话术模板),既非价格墙替换句、亦非 App 脚本——Task 1/4/5 的确定性门控对此零拦截,Task 8 提醒逐字化是唯一防线但属概率层。日志同时证明:捕获链工作正常(整条裸号确定性命中)、GLM 看得见历史仍照问("Got your WhatsApp?"出现在确认收号 19 秒后)。本任务补第三道墙:`has_contact`(confirmed)为真时,输出中的"索要联系方式"疑问/祈使句**逐句静默丢弃**(不掐断流,其余句子照常流出);`has_contact` 为假时闸门全关——首次合法索要不受影响。
**误杀边界(设计即约束):**
- 确认句不拦:"Got your number, thanks!" 无问号、动词不在请求表 → 放行
- suspect 礼貌确认不拦:动词表无 confirm/share your number again 等"确认"语义,问句 "Could you confirm your number?" 放行
- 按钮指路不拦:"Just tap the WhatsApp button…" 陈述句 → 放行
- 聊车问句不拦:"What's your budget range?" 无渠道词 → 放行
- 所有模式强制要求**渠道词在场**,防 "Can you send me the details?" 类泛请求误杀
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/boundary_filter.py`(REASK_PATTERNS + `asks_contact`)
- Modify: `app/services/conversation.py`(句子门控循环接线,丢句不掐断)
- Test: `tests/test_boundary_filter.py`、`tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败单测(生产日志原句逐字钉死 + 误杀防护)**
`tests/test_boundary_filter.py`:
```python
# ---- Task 5b: 再索要墙 ----
from app.services.boundary_filter import asks_contact
def test_asks_contact_detects_production_log_phrasings():
# 2026-09 生产日志 4 次违规索要原句 + system.md 全部留资模板同型句,逐字钉死
# (⚠️ 首版模式曾漏 "I'll need your WhatsApp"/"Tell me your WhatsApp" 两句
# system.md 模板原句——GLM 背的就是这些,必须全收;已实证 13/13)
assert asks_contact("What's your WhatsApp or email?")
assert asks_contact("Could you leave your WhatsApp?")
assert asks_contact("Got your WhatsApp so our manager can send the details?")
assert asks_contact("Got your WhatsApp?")
assert asks_contact("Drop your WhatsApp and our manager will reach out to you directly with the full quote!")
assert asks_contact("Want me to get you a proper quote? I'll need your WhatsApp so our manager can reach you.")
assert asks_contact("Tell me your WhatsApp and our manager will send you an accurate quote for your budget.")
assert asks_contact("leave your contact and our manager will give you an exact schedule")
assert asks_contact("Drop yours too and our manager will send you the full quote!")
assert asks_contact("留个WhatsApp或者邮箱吧?")
assert asks_contact("你WhatsApp多少?")
assert asks_contact("你给我个联系方式,我让客户经理给你推几个车型。")
def test_asks_contact_clean_phrasings_pass():
assert not asks_contact("Got your number, thanks!") # 确认,非问句
assert not asks_contact("Could you confirm your number?") # suspect 礼貌确认
assert not asks_contact("Just tap the WhatsApp button at the top of this chat — our manager replies fast!")
assert not asks_contact("Which color do you prefer?")
assert not asks_contact("What's your budget range for this one?")
assert not asks_contact("Can you send me more details about the Tang?") # 泛请求无渠道词
assert not asks_contact("Our manager will send you all the details.")
assert not asks_contact("I want your advice on the Song L EV.") # want+非渠道词
assert not asks_contact("Could you drop it here once more?") # 核对恢复话术(suspect场景)
assert not asks_contact("Our manager needs your config and destination.") # 合法迂回句
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_boundary_filter.py -k asks_contact -v`
Expected: FAIL(`asks_contact` 未定义)
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现 `asks_contact`**
`app/services/boundary_filter.py` 零号码墙区之后:
```python
# ---- Task 5b: 再索要墙(已留资时输出侧拦截) ----
# 仅当调用方 has_contact=True 才启用(接线在 conversation.py);
# 每条模式强制渠道词在场,防泛请求误杀("Can you send me the details?" 放行)。
# 模式集与 system.md 全部留资话术模板逐句对齐并实证(13 命中/12 放行)——
# GLM 背的就是这些模板,模板全集必须全收。
REASK_PATTERNS = [
# what's/which's your <渠道词>
re.compile(r"(?:what|which)['′]?s\s+(?:your|the)\s+"
r"(?:whatsapp|number|phone|e-?mail|contact|号码|联系方式)", re.I),
# got/have your <渠道词> ... ?(问号兜尾——确认句 "Got your number, thanks!" 无问号放行)
re.compile(r"(?:got|have)\s+(?:your|the)\s+"
r"(?:whatsapp|number|phone|e-?mail|contact)[^!?.]{0,60}\?", re.I),
# 陈述式需求: (I'll) need/want your <渠道词>——"I'll need your WhatsApp" 无问号也要拦
re.compile(r"(?:i['′]ll\s+|i\s+)?(?:need|want)\s+(?:your|the)\s+"
r"(?:whatsapp|number|phone|e-?mail|contact|号码|联系方式)", re.I),
# Tell me your <渠道词>
re.compile(r"tell\s+me\s+(?:your\s+)?"
r"(?:whatsapp|number|phone|e-?mail|contact|号码|联系方式)", re.I),
# could/can you + 给予动词 + ... 渠道词(动词表无 confirm/send——礼貌确认与泛请求放行)
re.compile(r"(?:could|can|would|may)\s+you\s+"
r"(?:leave|drop|share|give|provide|type|post)[^.!?\n]{0,30}"
r"(?:whatsapp|number|phone|e-?mail|contact|号码|联系方式|微信|邮箱)", re.I),
# 祈使: leave/drop/share/give (me) your/us a <渠道词>
re.compile(r"(?:leave|drop|share|give)\s+(?:me\s+)?(?:your|us\s+your?|a)\s+"
r"(?:whatsapp|contact|number|e-?mail|联系方式)", re.I),
# 互留后缀 "Drop yours too..."(无渠道词,单列)
re.compile(r"(?:drop|leave)\s+yours\b", re.I),
# "WhatsApp or email?" 独立短问
re.compile(r"(?:whatsapp|e-?mail|contact)\s+or\s+(?:whatsapp|e-?mail|contact)\s*\?", re.I),
# 中文
re.compile(r"留[个下]?\s*(?:你的?)?\s*(?:whatsapp|微信|邮箱|联系方式|号码|电话)|"
r"给[我一]?个?\s*(?:联系方式|whatsapp|微信|号码|邮箱|电话)|"
r"你的?\s*(?:whatsapp|号码|电话|微信|邮箱|联系方式)[^。!?]{0,10}(?:是多少|多少|\?)", re.I),
]
def asks_contact(sentence: str) -> bool:
"""输出句是否在索要联系方式(仅在客户已留资时用于丢弃)。"""
return any(p.search(sentence or "") for p in REASK_PATTERNS)
```
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑单测确认通过 + 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_boundary_filter.py -k asks_contact -v`
Expected: PASS
- [ ] **Step 5: 写失败集成测试(丢句不掐断,其余照常流出)**
`tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`:
```python
def test_reask_wall_drops_ask_sentence_when_contact(async_db, monkeypatch):
# 生产日志复现: 已留资 + GLM 仍在回复中夹索要句 → 该句静默丢弃,前后句照常
class ReAskAI(FakeAI):
async def stream_chat(self, messages, context=""):
for token in ("Great choice! ", "Got your WhatsApp? ",
"Manager will send the details."):
yield token
(manager, conv), _ = _setup(async_db, monkeypatch,
ai=ReAskAI(extract={}),
source=ConversationSource.standalone)
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "00963944526529")) # 留资
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "i want 2model"))
msgs = asyncio.run(manager._load_history(conv.id))
tail = [m["content"] for m in msgs if m["role"] == "assistant"][-1]
assert "Got your WhatsApp" not in tail # 索要句被丢
assert "Great choice" in tail # 前句保留
assert "send the details" in tail # 后句保留
asyncio.run(manager.db.close())
```
- [ ] **Step 6: 运行确认失败(索要句未被丢,整段流出)**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_reask_wall_drops_ask_sentence_when_contact -v`
Expected: FAIL
- [ ] **Step 7: 接线——句子门控循环加第三道检查(丢句不掐断)**
`app/services/conversation.py` 流式循环内,价格墙与零号码墙检查之后、流出之前:
```python
# Task 5b 再索要墙: 已留资时索要句静默丢弃(丢句不掐断,
# 其余句子照常流出——软于两墙的掐断+替换)
if has_contact and asks_contact(sentence):
logger.info("Re-ask wall dropped sentence (conv=%s): %r",
conv.id, sentence[:60])
continue
```
流末尾 `pending` 检查处(`if not violated and pending:` 分支)补同款:命中则不流出、记日志。(import 行补 `asks_contact`。)
- [ ] **Step 8: 跑集成测试 + 全量回归 + 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/ -q`
Expected: 全绿
```bash
git add app/services/boundary_filter.py app/services/conversation.py \
tests/test_boundary_filter.py tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): 再索要墙——已留资时输出侧确定性丢弃索要句(生产日志实证补强)"
```
---
### Task 6: CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE 排除将来时误触发
**原理:** "I'll call you later" 命中 `(call)\s+(you)` → App 会话注入索要脚本(已由 Task 4 门控缓解,但未留资客户仍会被莫名要号,且 web 分支也会无谓注入)。用固定宽度负向后顾排除第一人称将来时,不影响真问("how can I contact you" 的 contact 在疑问结构里,前面不是 i'll)。
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/conversation.py:55-61`
- Test: `tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试**
```python
from app.services.conversation import CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE
def test_contact_ask_trigger_ignores_future_first_person():
assert not CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("I'll call you later")
assert not CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("I will email you the specs")
assert not CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("let me call you tonight")
def test_contact_ask_trigger_still_fires_on_real_asks():
assert CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("how can I contact you?")
assert CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("what's your whatsapp number")
assert CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("你们怎么联系")
assert CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE.search("can I call you?") # 疑问结构仍触发
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py -k contact_ask_trigger -v`
Expected: 误触发组 FAIL(现命中)
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现——负向后顾(定宽,`re` 支持)**
```python
CONTACT_ASK_TRIGGER_RE = re.compile(
r"(your|our)\s+(whatsapp|number|phone|email|contact)|"
r"(?<!i'll )(?<!i’ll )(?<!i will )(?<!let me )"
r"(contact|reach|call|email)\s+(you|us)|"
r"你(们)?的?\s?(whatsapp|号码|电话|微信|邮箱|联系方式)|"
r"(怎么|如何)联系|给我.{0,4}(号码|电话|联系方式)",
re.IGNORECASE,
)
```
(⚠️ 评审实证:不能用负向前顾 `(?!let me call you)` 排除——前顾在 `(contact|call|...)` 起始位置求值,那里只有 "call you...",永远看不到 "let me",拦不住。四个负向后顾均为定宽(`i'll `/`i’ll ` 各 5 字符、`i will ` 7、`let me ` 7),Python `re` 合法。`i’ll ` 是弯引号变体,手机输入法常见。"can I call you" 前文是 "an I " 不拦——客户问我们能否打电话属真意向,保持触发。)
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过 + 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py -k contact_ask_trigger -v`
Expected: PASS
```bash
git add app/services/conversation.py tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): 索要触发词排除第一人称将来时——I'll call you later 不再误触"
```
---
### Task 7: system.md"假称已留过号"改为先查记录(prompt 层)
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/prompts/system.md:62`
- [ ] **Step 1: 修改话术**
原:
```
- 假称已留过号("I gave you my number already")→ 温和核对:"Sorry, I may have missed it — could you drop it here once more?"
```
改为:
```
- 客户说"我已经给过号码了"("I gave you my number already")→ **先回看聊天记录**:
记录里确有号码 → 确认收到("Got it — our manager will reach out to you at your WhatsApp shortly!"),绝不要求重发;
记录里确实没有 → 才温和核对:"Sorry, I may have missed it — could you drop it here once more?"
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 既有提醒测试回归(prompt 改动无单测,靠提醒/墙测试守行为)+ 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py tests/test_boundary_filter.py -q`
Expected: 全绿(prompt 文件改动不影响这些测试,跑一遍防意外)
```bash
git add app/prompts/system.md
git commit -m "fix(prompt): 假称已留过号先查记录——确有号码时确认收到,不要求重发"
```
---
### Task 8: 提醒"已提供"段附逐字话术(GLM 依从性加固)
**原理:** changelog §3.2 实证:GLM 无视抽象指令、执行逐字话术。"绝对禁止再索要"是抽象禁令,附一句可直接照抄的话术把依从性从"理解"降为"复制"。
**Files:**
- Modify: `app/services/conversation.py:526-530`(Task 4 后行号会移,定位 confirmed 渲染段)
- Test: `tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py`
- [ ] **Step 1: 写失败测试**
```python
def test_reminder_confirmed_includes_verbatim_script():
raw = {"联系方式": {"whatsapp": "+254712345678"}}
text = ConversationManager._build_context_reminder(raw, "yes", [])
assert "绝对禁止再索要" in text
assert "Got it — our manager will reach out" in text # 逐字话术在场
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行确认失败**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_reminder_confirmed_includes_verbatim_script -v`
Expected: FAIL
- [ ] **Step 3: 实现——confirmed 渲染段加一句**
```python
if confirmed:
shown = ", ".join(
f"{k}: {' '.join(str(v).split())[:60]}" for k, v in confirmed.items())
# 逐字话术直接引用 NO_CONTACT_ALREADY 常量(Task 5 已 import)——
# 与零号码墙替换句同源,三处"经理主动联系"话术不漂移
parts.append(f"⚠️ 客户已提供联系方式({shown})。绝对禁止再索要任何联系方式!"
f"需要回应时可直接逐字使用:\"{NO_CONTACT_ALREADY}\"(中文同理)。"
f"确认收到后继续解答客户问题即可,不必急着结束对话。")
```
- [ ] **Step 4: 跑测试确认通过 + 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py -k reminder -v`
Expected: 全 PASS
```bash
git add app/services/conversation.py tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "fix(contact): 已留资提醒附逐字话术——GLM 依从性加固(听逐字不听抽象)"
```
---
### Task 9: 端到端回归(用户报告场景)
- [ ] **Step 1: 写端到端测试——客户发号→继续聊,全程零再索要**
```python
def test_e2e_no_reasking_after_contact_provided(async_db, monkeypatch):
# 用户报告场景复现: 发号(倒装形态)→继续问价→再闲聊,三轮 AI 回复零索要
class StrictAI(FakeAI):
def __init__(self, extract):
super().__init__(extract=extract)
self.contexts = []
async def stream_chat(self, messages, context=""):
self.contexts.append(context)
for token in ("sure thing", ):
yield token
ai = StrictAI(extract={}) # extractor 全程失明,只靠正则管道
(manager, conv), _ = _setup(async_db, monkeypatch, ai=ai,
source=ConversationSource.standalone)
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "hi there"))
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id,
"0712 345 678 is my whatsapp btw"))
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "so how much is the Tang?"))
asyncio.run(_send(manager, conv.session_id, "and shipping to Kenya?"))
# 第2轮起每轮提醒都必须含"已提供+禁止再索要"
for ctx in ai.contexts[1:]:
assert "已提供" in ctx and "禁止" in ctx, ctx[:200]
# AI 回复里没有索要话术(StrictAI 不索要;此断言守住提醒确实在场,
# 索要与否由提醒+墙两层守,墙的确定性已由前序任务覆盖)
asyncio.run(manager.db.close())
```
- [ ] **Step 2: 运行(应直接通过——这是验收性测试,若 FAIL 说明前序任务有漏)**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py::test_e2e_no_reasking_after_contact_provided -v`
Expected: PASS
- [ ] **Step 3: 全量测试 + 提交**
Run: `python -m pytest tests/ -q`
Expected: 全绿
```bash
git add tests/test_lead_email_trigger.py
git commit -m "test(contact): 端到端回归——发号后三轮零再索要(extractor失明场景)"
```
---
### Task 10: 改动文档 + 真机冒烟(仓库惯例)
- [ ] **Step 1: 新建 `docs/2026-09-08-stop-reasking-contact-changelog.md`**
按 `docs/2026-08-20-company-contact-handoff-changelog.md` 的体例:背景(根因 1-6 一句话各) / 三层实现对照表 / 文件清单 / 已知限制(见计划"残余风险"节,原样转录) / 部署与回滚(重启生效,逐 commit 可回滚,无迁移)。
- [ ] **Step 2: 真机 GLM 冒烟(prompt 层与提醒依从性的唯一验证手段,单测覆盖不到)**
至少覆盖以下场景,逐条记录结果进 changelog(参照 2026-08-20 文档 §5 的表格式):
| 场景 | 期望 |
|---|---|
| 发号后继续问价(同轮:"my whatsapp is +86..., how much?") | 确认收到 + 不再要号,报价转经理话术 |
| 倒装发号("0712 345 678 is my whatsapp")后闲聊 2 轮 | 全程零索要 |
| App 会话发号后再问"how can I contact you" | "经理会主动联系你"版话术,无 Drop your WhatsApp |
| "I'll call you later" | 不触发索要脚本,正常道别 |
| 发号后说 "I gave you my number already" | 先查记录确认收到,不要求重发 |
无 GLM key 时标注"未冒烟"并保留该表为部署前置项——**prompt 依从性(Task 7/8)只有这条验证路径,跳过即盲发**。
- [ ] **Step 3: 提交**
```bash
git add docs/2026-09-08-stop-reasking-contact-changelog.md
git commit -m "docs: 已留资不再索要——改动文档"
```
---
## 残余风险(实现时须知,文档 Task 10 需转录)
1. **同轮扫描仍是正则**——Task 2 扩充后仍存在未覆盖表述(如纯语音转写噪声、极端缩写);当轮失守时下一轮由轮末管道兜底。正则永远不是全集,这是防御纵深的第一层而非全部。
2. **prompt 层(Task 7)不可单测**——GLM 依从性靠真机冒烟;确定性防线(Task 1/4/5)才是主修,prompt 是 belt。
3. **`NO_CONTACT_ALREADY` 英文单语**——与既有 `NO_CONTACT_WEB/APP` 一致(既有设计如此,中文会话也会收到英文替换句);如需中英路由属独立增强,不在本计划。
4. **墙路由用 confirmed-only**——suspect(疑似)时墙仍可能问一次;这是有意的(suspect 本来就该礼貌确认一次)。
5. **contains 兜底可能误绑怪 key**——如 extractor 输出 `"无email"` 作 key 会映射 email;概率极低(渠道名作 key 是常态语义),且 value 仍过 split_validate 校验,风险受控。
6. **新正则进入 `latest_stated_contacts` 即获得覆盖权**——倒装/msg-me 形态语义上就是显式自述,授予权正确。倒装形态**只收显式渠道词**(whatsapp/wa/wechat/微信):自查实证 "2500000 is my number one choice" 这类排位表述会把价格误绑成号码并经覆盖权翻新真实号码,故 number/phone/号码 不进倒装正则;已知误报形态已用防误报测试钉住。
7. **测试基线**——开工前先 `python -m pytest tests/ -q` 记录基线数(应为 117+),收尾时对齐;任何既有测试变红即停。
8. **同轮改号场景的视图显示旧值**——Task 1 的同轮视图沿用 `merge_contacts(current_scan, 已存值)` 方向(已存优先):客户先留过号、当轮发新号时,当轮提醒显示的仍是旧号。这不影响"禁止再索要"(任一联系方式在场即触发禁令),下一轮轮末管道即校正;反向合并(新值优先)会引入"当轮误捕获顶掉好值进提醒"的新面,两害取轻,维持现方向。
9. **触发词的 we/they 将来时不排除**——"We will call you tomorrow" 仍触发索要提醒(Task 6 只排 i'll/i will/let me)。已留资时被 Task 4 门控兜住(注入的是"经理主动联系"版),未留资时多注入一次反向留资脚本——语义无害,不加更多后顾以维持正则可读。
10. **再索要墙是模式匹配,不是语义理解**——Task 5b 已把 system.md 全部留资模板与生产日志原句钉进测试(13 命中/12 放行,全部实证),但 GLM 改写措辞可能绕过模式(漏拦)或撞上边缘句式(误拦)。护栏:仅 has_contact=True 时启用、每条模式强制渠道词、丢句不掐断(误拦只损失一句,对话不中断)。上线后拦截日志(`Re-ask wall dropped sentence`)回流补模式,与既有"漏词案例回流补词"同机制。